If mass increases as an object approaches the speed of light, wouldn't it become a black hole? - lighted billiard balls
Is it correct to say that the mass of an object increases with its speed, until the speed of light, when the mass is reached infinitely?
If so, does this not mean that the seriousness of the task also increases?
As it was approaching the speed of light, no object, go into a black hole? Because of his incredible mass and gravity?
If the size of the object? Perhaps a billiard ball with the speed of light would take to achieve this effect, while a large planet could be a black hole is only 90.000 kilometers / s?
Bonus Question "is my right to answer this question? Http: / / uk.answers.yahoo.com / question /; _y ...
3 comments:
Mass is not at an increasing rate! Due to the curvature of space as it approaches the speed of light "dig" by the impression of increasing mass.
Imagine driving a car very fast along a long road that has a very low inclination. Plus the car goes over the sink suspension, tires will be charged more friction and others will be induced. The mass does not change due to the increase downforce, but the slight incline of the road. It can say very easily that the dough goes, but in reality, the curvature of space gives you the impression.
You can double the size of two ways. With the speed and mass. The area is more vulnerable it is harder to move the object. Something like a bowling ball rolling on a soft pillow on which it flows in comparison with the role on a flat surface.
"Is the size of the object? Perhaps a billiard ball with the speed of light would have to go to achieve this effect, while a large planet could beA black hole only 90.000 kilometers / s? "
Yes, the mass of the object. It will take the same energy to move a planet at light speed when driving and only 90,000 km / h it moves like a spaceship with the speed of light.
Is the distortion of the 4th Added dimension of time and determines the speed of light. If you could somehow sitting in a much more massive object like a neutron star, are the things visible to the naked eye, which is impossible, would do on Earth. They could be seen in visible black hole, for example.
The answer is no, because it requires the creation of a black hole reaches a threshold density of the rest mass. If I were a spaceship comes to nearly light speed, my spaceship and still the same weight in my moving frame of reference. And, no, no curved space-time money, so if my spaceship and a giant black hole, you suck, I think I'm still fast in my ship. Recall that the first principle of relativity is that I can not determine what my own pace, unless checked by the others. So I do not think expect to fall into a black hole, while "near the speed of light" more than expected to occur during rotation.
It is very difficult for a planet orbiting close to the speed of light around a star, because it is a reference rate, unless it is in orbit around a supermassive black hole near its Event Horizon. It should be "running", because the orbit is constant is not possible, the first place. In the short timeabsorbed before the planet from the black hole is (waiting for the surprise in my speed boat into the black hole, right?), the universe in a field of stars on the one hand, distorted, and seems to be fully shared by Blue Men forward in the direction of the planet, and the black hole appears in an infinite plane of the other side to be, and the world rushes towards the horizon. Scientific American has an article on this one, but I do not know what years.
The answer is no, because it requires the creation of a black hole reaches a threshold density of the rest mass. If I were a spaceship comes to nearly light speed, my spaceship and still the same weight in my moving frame of reference. And, no, no curved space-time money, so if my spaceship and a giant black hole, you suck, I think I'm still fast in my ship. Recall that the first principle of relativity is that I can not determine what my own pace, unless checked by the others. So I do not think expect to fall into a black hole, while "near the speed of light" more than expected to occur during rotation.
It is very difficult for a planet orbiting close to the speed of light around a star, because it is a reference rate, unless it is in orbit around a supermassive black hole near its Event Horizon. It should be "running", because the orbit is constant is not possible, the first place. In the short timeabsorbed before the planet from the black hole is (waiting for the surprise in my speed boat into the black hole, right?), the universe in a field of stars on the one hand, distorted, and seems to be fully shared by Blue Men forward in the direction of the planet, and the black hole appears in an infinite plane of the other side to be, and the world rushes towards the horizon. Scientific American has an article on this one, but I do not know what years.
Post a Comment